Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro Cases

Hip and Knee Replacement Manufacturers

Date Filed: July 9, 2008

Court: U.S. District Court

Location: New Jersey

Hagens Berman filed a lawsuit against some of the nation's largest hip and knee replacement manufacturers claiming the companies engaged in a pervasive kickback scheme developed to boost sales and profits.

The lawsuit claims these manufacturers lavish doctors and surgeons with large kickbacks, expensive meals, golf trips and more in an effort to increase use of particular products.

The alleged practice violates anti-kickback laws and already resulted in a payout of $311 million to settle government claims. The Department of Justice claimed the industry routinely violated the anti-kickback statute by paying physicians to use their products exclusively.

This lawsuit, filed on behalf of patients, claims the doctors and manufacturers are putting profits and sales ahead of patient safety and health. Often doctors receive more than $100,000 in royalties for using a specific device- a huge incentive to choose money over health.

If you've had a knee or hip replacement anytime between 2003 and December 31, 2007 with products from the following manufacturers please contact HBSS by joining this case or e-mailing info@hbsslaw.com.

Manufacturers and Products in Question:

• Stryker Orthopedics
  
• Duracon System
  
• EIUS
  
• Global Modular Replacement System (GMRS)
  
• Scorpio System
  
• Triathlon System
  
• Smith & Nephew Inc.
  
• Journey Device B1 Knee System